Clarifying response strategy
I see that there’s a note about handling special user requests. It suggests running commands for simple requests, but here, it seems more relevant to just ask for clarification instead. I think the best approach would be to produce a clear and concise response that reflects that understanding. Keeping it simple and straightforward should help communicate effectively!
\n
你是想要这条的哪种处理方式？我可以：
- 写一条50-80字的新闻快讯
- 做个更详细的赛况简报与影响解读
- 解释规则：何种情形会被直接红牌、停赛与追加处罚
- 背景科普：什么是“故意吃牌”，过往被调查/处罚的案例
- 英文翻译与配套关键词
\n
\n
需要的话，我也可以帮你查证具体比赛与来源链接。你选个编号或告诉我倾向。